1984 Sabre 34 vs Catalina 28 — Comparison

1984 Sabre 34
VS
Catalina 28Catalina 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 Sabre 34Catalina 28
General
ManufacturerSabreCatalina
Year1984–19901998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)2.90 m (9.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)2,812 kg (6,199 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 Sabre 34
16.96
Catalina 28
17.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 Sabre 34
41.74
Catalina 28
40.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 Sabre 34
0.74
Catalina 28
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 Sabre 34
21.14
Catalina 28
16.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 Sabre 34 and Catalina 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Sabre 34 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the Catalina 28 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1984 Sabre 34 was penned by Roger Hewson. The Catalina 28 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1984 Sabre 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the Catalina 28 at 8.69m (28.5ft) with a 2.90m beam. The 1984 Sabre 34 is 1.67m longer than the Catalina 28. The 1984 Sabre 34 displaces approximately 85% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 Sabre 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.96 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The Catalina 28, with an SA/D of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 Sabre 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Catalina 28 has a comfort ratio of 16.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1984 Sabre 34 and 40.3% for the Catalina 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 Sabre 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Catalina 28 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Sabre 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 Sabre 34 · Catalina 28