Catalina 28 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison

Catalina 28Catalina 28
VS
1979 Pearson 371979 Pearson 37

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 281979 Pearson 37
General
ManufacturerCatalinaPearson
Year1998–20041979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA8.69 m (28.5 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.43 m (11.3 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,812 kg (6,199 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area33.5 m² (361 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 28
17.09
1979 Pearson 37
15.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 28
40.33
1979 Pearson 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 28
0.82
1979 Pearson 37
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 28
16.59
1979 Pearson 37
24.10

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 28 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 28 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The Catalina 28 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the Catalina 28 measures 8.69m (28.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The 1979 Pearson 37 is 2.59m longer than the Catalina 28. The 1979 Pearson 37 displaces approximately 158% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.3% for the Catalina 28 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 28 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 28 · 1979 Pearson 37