1985 Contest 36 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1985 Contest 361985 Contest 36
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Contest 361973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerContestRanger
Year1985–19951973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area54.0 m² (581 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Contest 36
15.75
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Contest 36
41.54
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Contest 36
0.73
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Contest 36
21.78
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Contest 36 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Contest 36 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1985 Contest 36 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1985 Contest 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1985 Contest 36 is 0.91m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The 1985 Contest 36 displaces approximately 36% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Contest 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.75 and 54.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1985 Contest 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Contest 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1985 Contest 36 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Contest 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Contest 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1985 Contest 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Contest 36 · 1973 Ranger 33