1985 Sabre 38 vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison

1985 Sabre 38
VS
1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Sabre 381972 Contest 31
General
ManufacturerSabreContest
Year1985–19921972–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSANetherlands
DesignerRoger HewsonDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.2 m² (659 ft²)39.5 m² (425 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Sabre 38
16.59
1972 Contest 31
14.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Sabre 38
43.75
1972 Contest 31
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Sabre 38
0.74
1972 Contest 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Sabre 38
21.08
1972 Contest 31
23.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Sabre 38 and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Sabre 38 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1985 Sabre 38 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1985 Sabre 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1985 Sabre 38 is 2.13m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1985 Sabre 38 displaces approximately 60% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Sabre 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.59 and 61.2 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1985 Sabre 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Sabre 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.8% for the 1985 Sabre 38 and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Sabre 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1985 Sabre 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1985 Sabre 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Sabre 38 · 1972 Contest 31