1972 Contest 31 vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31
VS
2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Contest 312014 Elan 400
General
ManufacturerContestElan
Year1972–19822014–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsSlovenia
DesignerDick ZaalRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.5 m² (425 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 2.62m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2014 Elan 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Contest 31 · 2014 Elan 400