1985 Sabre 38 vs Hunter 36 — Comparison

1985 Sabre 38 1985 Sabre 38
VS
Hunter 36 Hunter 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1985 Sabre 38 Hunter 36
General
Manufacturer Sabre Hunter
Year 1985–1992 1996–2001
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Roger Hewson Glenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.56 m (11.7 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 61.2 m² (659 ft²) 56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 27 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Sabre 38
16.59
Hunter 36
17.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Sabre 38
43.75
Hunter 36
39.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Sabre 38
0.74
Hunter 36
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Sabre 38
21.08
Hunter 36
17.17

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Sabre 38 and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Sabre 38 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1985 Sabre 38 was penned by Roger Hewson. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1985 Sabre 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1985 Sabre 38 is 0.76m longer than the Hunter 36. The 1985 Sabre 38 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Sabre 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.59 and 61.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Sabre 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 43.8% for the 1985 Sabre 38 and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Sabre 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Sabre 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1985 Sabre 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS