Hunter 36 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison
Hunter 36
1998 Feeling 44
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 36 | 1998 Feeling 44 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Feeling |
| Year | 1996–2001 | 1998–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 13.41 m (44.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 11.50 m (37.7 ft) |
| Beam | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) | 4.10 m (13.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.90 m (6.2 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) | 10,500 kg (23,149 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs) | 4,000 kg (8,818 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 56.0 m² (603 ft²) | 82.0 m² (883 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 27 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 170 L (44.9 gal) | 400 L (105.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 36 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.
In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 2.59m longer than the Hunter 36. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1998 Feeling 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.