Catalina 445 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison

Catalina 445 Catalina 445
VS
1998 Feeling 44 1998 Feeling 44

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 445 1998 Feeling 44
General
Manufacturer Catalina Feeling
Year 2016 1998–2005
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Gerry Douglas Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios
Dimensions
LOA 13.56 m (44.5 ft) 13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL 11.89 m (39.0 ft) 11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam 4.17 m (13.7 ft) 4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft 2.06 m (6.8 ft) 1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 11,340 kg (25,000 lbs) 10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) 4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 84.0 m² (904 ft²) 82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity 379 L (100.1 gal) 400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 8
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 445
16.91
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 445
38.00
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 445
0.74
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 445
16.94
1998 Feeling 44
16.90

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 445 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 445 is a modern design by Catalina from USA, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Catalina 445 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.

In terms of size, the Catalina 445 measures 13.56m (44.5ft) overall with a beam of 4.17m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The Catalina 445 is 0.15m longer than the 1998 Feeling 44. The Catalina 445 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 445 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.91 and 84.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 Feeling 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 445 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.0% for the Catalina 445 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 445 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 445 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Feeling 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Feeling 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS