1985 Sabre 38 vs 2000 Najad 355 — Comparison

1985 Sabre 38 1985 Sabre 38
VS
2000 Najad 355 2000 Najad 355

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1985 Sabre 38 2000 Najad 355
General
Manufacturer Sabre Najad
Year 1985–1992 2000–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Sweden
Designer Roger Hewson Judel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 10.72 m (35.2 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam 3.56 m (11.7 ft) 3.38 m (11.1 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 61.2 m² (659 ft²) 51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 110 L (29.1 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Sabre 38
16.59
2000 Najad 355
15.69
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Sabre 38
43.75
2000 Najad 355
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Sabre 38
0.74
2000 Najad 355
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Sabre 38
21.08
2000 Najad 355
20.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Sabre 38 and 2000 Najad 355 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Sabre 38 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1985 Sabre 38 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 2000 Najad 355 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1985 Sabre 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2000 Najad 355 at 10.72m (35.2ft) with a 3.38m beam. The 1985 Sabre 38 is 0.86m longer than the 2000 Najad 355. The 1985 Sabre 38 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Sabre 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.59 and 61.2 m² of sail area. The 2000 Najad 355, with an SA/D of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1985 Sabre 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Sabre 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2000 Najad 355 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.8% for the 1985 Sabre 38 and 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Sabre 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2000 Najad 355 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 110L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Sabre 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1985 Sabre 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1985 Sabre 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS