1985 Sabre 38 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

1985 Sabre 38
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Sabre 382000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerSabreSabre
Year1985–19922000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.2 m² (659 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Sabre 38
16.59
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Sabre 38
43.75
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Sabre 38
0.74
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Sabre 38
21.08
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Sabre 38 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Sabre 38 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1985 Sabre 38 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1985 Sabre 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Sabre 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.59 and 61.2 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1985 Sabre 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Sabre 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.8% for the 1985 Sabre 38 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Sabre 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Sabre 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1985 Sabre 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Sabre 38 · 2000 Sabre 386