Hunter 380 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

Hunter 380Hunter 380
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3802000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerHunterSabre
Year2001–20052000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area64.0 m² (689 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 380
17.35
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 380
37.51
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 380
0.78
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 380
17.27
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 380 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 380 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Hunter 380 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Hunter 380 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 380 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 380 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Hunter 380 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 380 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 380 · 2000 Sabre 386