Catalina 425 vs Hunter 380 — Comparison

Catalina 425Catalina 425
VS
Hunter 380Hunter 380

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 425Hunter 380
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year20132001–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.95 m (42.5 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL11.28 m (37.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,616 kg (21,200 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast3,719 kg (8,199 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area78.0 m² (840 ft²)64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity322 L (85.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 425
17.52
Hunter 380
17.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 425
38.68
Hunter 380
37.51
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 425
0.75
Hunter 380
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 425
17.02
Hunter 380
17.27

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 425 and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 425 is a modern design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Catalina 425 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the Catalina 425 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Catalina 425 is 1.37m longer than the Hunter 380. The Catalina 425 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 425 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.52 and 78.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 425 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 425 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the Catalina 425 and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 425 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 322L of water capacity and 152L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 425 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 425 · Hunter 380