2003 Hunter 41 AC vs Hunter 380 — Comparison
Hunter 380
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2003 Hunter 41 AC | Hunter 380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Hunter |
| Year | 2003–2007 | 2001–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| Beam | 4.09 m (13.4 ft) | 3.76 m (12.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,072 kg (20,000 lbs) | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 73.2 m² (788 ft²) | 64.0 m² (689 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Shoal draft | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 227 L (60.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 7 |
| Cabins | 3 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is 0.92m longer than the Hunter 380. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · Hunter 380