Hanse 400 vs Hunter 380 — Comparison

Hanse 400
VS
Hunter 380Hunter 380

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 400Hunter 380
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year2002–20062001–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.60 m (34.8 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
Hunter 380
17.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
Hunter 380
37.51
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
Hunter 380
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
Hunter 380
17.27

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Hanse 400 is 0.52m longer than the Hunter 380. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 400 · Hunter 380