Hunter 380 vs 1979 Cal 39 — Comparison

Hunter 380Hunter 380
VS
1979 Cal 391979 Cal 39

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3801979 Cal 39
General
ManufacturerHunterCal
Year2001–20051979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area64.0 m² (689 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 380
17.35
1979 Cal 39
15.78
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 380
37.51
1979 Cal 39
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 380
0.78
1979 Cal 39
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 380
17.27
1979 Cal 39
21.05

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 380 and 1979 Cal 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 380 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1979 Cal 39 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The Hunter 380 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1979 Cal 39 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the Hunter 380 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1979 Cal 39 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1979 Cal 39 is 0.31m longer than the Hunter 380. The 1979 Cal 39 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 380 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Cal 39, with an SA/D of 15.78 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 380 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1979 Cal 39 has a comfort ratio of 21.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Hunter 380 and 41.7% for the 1979 Cal 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 380 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1979 Cal 39 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Cal 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 380 · 1979 Cal 39