1994 Hylas 42 vs Hunter 380 — Comparison

1994 Hylas 42
VS
Hunter 380Hunter 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Hylas 42Hunter 380
General
ManufacturerHylasHunter
Year1994–20042001–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryTaiwanUSA
DesignerGerman FrersGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area74.3 m² (800 ft²)64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hylas 42
16.80
Hunter 380
17.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hylas 42
40.48
Hunter 380
37.51
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hylas 42
0.73
Hunter 380
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hylas 42
19.29
Hunter 380
17.27

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hylas 42 and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hylas 42 is a 1990s design by Hylas from Taiwan, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1994 Hylas 42 was penned by German Frers. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hylas 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The 1994 Hylas 42 is 1.22m longer than the Hunter 380. The 1994 Hylas 42 displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hylas 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hylas 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hylas 42 and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hylas 42 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hylas 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Hylas 42 · Hunter 380