1985 Westerly Storm 33 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

1985 Westerly Storm 33
VS
Hunter 27Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Westerly Storm 33Hunter 27
General
ManufacturerWesterlyHunter
Year1985–19901992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerEd DuboisHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.0 m² (484 ft²)33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
15.20
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
41.74
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
0.77
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
20.29
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 was penned by Ed Dubois. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is 1.83m longer than the Hunter 27. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 displaces approximately 109% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.20 and 45.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Westerly Storm 33 · Hunter 27