Catalina 36 MkII vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

Catalina 36 MkII
VS
Hunter 27Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 36 MkIIHunter 27
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year1999–20061992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL9.60 m (31.5 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.55 m (11.6 ft)2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.5 m² (608 ft²)33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine27 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 36 MkII
16.35
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 36 MkII
37.94
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 36 MkII
0.76
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 36 MkII
18.65
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 36 MkII and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The Catalina 36 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the Catalina 36 MkII measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The Catalina 36 MkII is 2.74m longer than the Hunter 27. The Catalina 36 MkII displaces approximately 164% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 36 MkII has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 36 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 36 MkII provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 36 MkII is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 36 MkII offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 36 MkII · Hunter 27