1967 Pearson 35 vs Catalina 36 MkII — Comparison

1967 Pearson 35
VS
Catalina 36 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Pearson 35Catalina 36 MkII
General
ManufacturerPearsonCatalina
Year1967–19731999–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.6 m² (523 ft²)56.5 m² (608 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Pearson 35
15.96
Catalina 36 MkII
16.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Pearson 35
41.67
Catalina 36 MkII
37.94
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Pearson 35
0.69
Catalina 36 MkII
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Pearson 35
26.00
Catalina 36 MkII
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Pearson 35 and Catalina 36 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The Catalina 36 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 36 MkII at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.55m beam. The Catalina 36 MkII is 0.30m longer than the 1967 Pearson 35. The Catalina 36 MkII displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 36 MkII, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 36 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The Catalina 36 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 36 MkII offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 36 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 36 MkII offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Pearson 35 · Catalina 36 MkII