1985 Westerly Storm 33 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1985 Westerly Storm 33 1985 Westerly Storm 33
VS
Hanse 342 Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1985 Westerly Storm 33 Hanse 342
General
Manufacturer Westerly Hanse
Year 1985–1990 2006–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK Germany
Designer Ed Dubois judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL 8.38 m (27.5 ft) 9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs) 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 45.0 m² (484 ft²) 52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Bilge Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
15.20
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
41.74
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
0.77
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
20.29
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 was penned by Ed Dubois. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Hanse 342 is 0.24m longer than the 1985 Westerly Storm 33. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.20 and 45.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS