1986 Bavaria 32 vs Hunter 260 — Comparison

1986 Bavaria 321986 Bavaria 32
VS
Hunter 260Hunter 260

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Bavaria 32Hunter 260
General
ManufacturerBavariaHunter
Year1986–19921998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerDehler DesignGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)7.85 m (25.8 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)6.86 m (22.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Ballast1,900 kg (4,189 lbs)771 kg (1,700 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)27.5 m² (296 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity75 L (19.8 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Bavaria 32
16.20
Hunter 260
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Bavaria 32
38.78
Hunter 260
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Bavaria 32
0.77
Hunter 260
0.87
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Bavaria 32
20.02
Hunter 260
15.99

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Bavaria 32 and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Bavaria 32 is a 1980s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1986 Bavaria 32 was penned by Dehler Design. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1986 Bavaria 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1986 Bavaria 32 is 1.90m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1986 Bavaria 32 displaces approximately 140% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Bavaria 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 260 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Bavaria 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 38.8% for the 1986 Bavaria 32 and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Bavaria 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 130L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Bavaria 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 260 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 Bavaria 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Bavaria 32 · Hunter 260