1986 Catalina 27 vs 1998 Dehler 29 — Comparison

1986 Catalina 27 1986 Catalina 27
VS
1998 Dehler 29 1998 Dehler 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1986 Catalina 27 1998 Dehler 29
General
Manufacturer Catalina Dehler
Year 1986–1991 1998–2006
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Frank Butler Judel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.82 m (28.9 ft)
LWL 6.86 m (22.5 ft) 7.60 m (24.9 ft)
Beam 2.69 m (8.8 ft) 2.95 m (9.7 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.55 m (5.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 3,200 kg (7,055 lbs)
Ballast 1,089 kg (2,401 lbs) 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 30.9 m² (333 ft²) 35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 14 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 40 L (10.6 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Catalina 27
16.11
1998 Dehler 29
16.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Catalina 27
40.01
1998 Dehler 29
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Catalina 27
0.77
1998 Dehler 29
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Catalina 27
21.18
1998 Dehler 29
18.34

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Catalina 27 and 1998 Dehler 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Catalina 27 is a 1980s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1998 Dehler 29 is a 1990s offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1986 Catalina 27 was penned by Frank Butler. The 1998 Dehler 29 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1986 Catalina 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.69m, compared to the 1998 Dehler 29 at 8.82m (28.9ft) with a 2.95m beam. The 1998 Dehler 29 is 0.59m longer than the 1986 Catalina 27. The 1998 Dehler 29 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Catalina 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.11 and 30.9 m² of sail area. The 1998 Dehler 29, with an SA/D of 16.38 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Dehler 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Catalina 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1998 Dehler 29 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1986 Catalina 27 and 37.5% for the 1998 Dehler 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Catalina 27 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1998 Dehler 29 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 80L water and 40L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Catalina 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Dehler 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 Catalina 27 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS