1986 Catalina 27 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

1986 Catalina 27 1986 Catalina 27
VS
1983 Pearson 31 1983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1986 Catalina 27 1983 Pearson 31
General
Manufacturer Catalina Pearson
Year 1986–1991 1983–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Frank Butler William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 6.86 m (22.5 ft) 7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam 2.69 m (8.8 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast 1,089 kg (2,401 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 30.9 m² (333 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Catalina 27
16.11
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Catalina 27
40.01
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Catalina 27
0.77
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Catalina 27
21.18
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Catalina 27 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Catalina 27 is a 1980s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1986 Catalina 27 was penned by Frank Butler. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1986 Catalina 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.69m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1983 Pearson 31 is 1.22m longer than the 1986 Catalina 27. The 1983 Pearson 31 displaces approximately 58% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Catalina 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.11 and 30.9 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1986 Catalina 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Catalina 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1986 Catalina 27 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Catalina 27 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Catalina 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS