1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F1984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyPearson
Year1986–19951984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL10.20 m (33.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.90 m (12.8 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area78.0 m² (840 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
16.52
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
40.00
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
0.71
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
21.84
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is a 1980s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F was penned by German Frers. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is 2.44m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F displaces approximately 93% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.52 and 78.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F · 1984 Pearson 34