1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Pacific Seacraft 251984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftPearson
Year1986–20071984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL5.94 m (19.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast953 kg (2,101 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area24.0 m² (258 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was penned by William Crealock. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1984 Pearson 34 is 2.74m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1984 Pearson 34 displaces approximately 140% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Pearson 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Pearson 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Pearson 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 · 1984 Pearson 34