1987 Cape Dory 40 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1987 Cape Dory 40
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1987 Cape Dory 401976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerCape DoryC&C Yachts
Year1987–19921976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerCarl AlbergCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.66 m (12.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area64.5 m² (694 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity284 L (75.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1987 Cape Dory 40 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s design by Cape Dory from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was penned by Carl Alberg. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1987 Cape Dory 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 2.13m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 90% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1987 Cape Dory 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1987 Cape Dory 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1987 Cape Dory 40 · 1976 C&C 33