1988 C&C 32 vs 1975 Cal 29 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
1975 Cal 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 321975 Cal 29
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsCal
Year1988–19931975–1981
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianBill Lapworth
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
1975 Cal 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
1975 Cal 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
1975 Cal 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
1975 Cal 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and 1975 Cal 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1975 Cal 29 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1975 Cal 29 was designed by Bill Lapworth.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1975 Cal 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1988 C&C 32 is 0.91m longer than the 1975 Cal 29. The 1988 C&C 32 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The 1975 Cal 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1975 Cal 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 42.9% for the 1975 Cal 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1975 Cal 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Cal 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 C&C 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · 1975 Cal 29