Hunter 356 vs 1975 Cal 29 — Comparison

Hunter 356Hunter 356
VS
1975 Cal 29

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3561975 Cal 29
General
ManufacturerHunterCal
Year2000–20051975–1981
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBill Lapworth
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL9.30 m (30.5 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.53 m (11.6 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 356
17.40
1975 Cal 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 356
40.00
1975 Cal 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 356
0.80
1975 Cal 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 356
16.38
1975 Cal 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 356 and 1975 Cal 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 356 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1975 Cal 29 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The Hunter 356 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1975 Cal 29 was designed by Bill Lapworth.

In terms of size, the Hunter 356 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.53m, compared to the 1975 Cal 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The Hunter 356 is 1.98m longer than the 1975 Cal 29. The Hunter 356 displaces approximately 71% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 356 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1975 Cal 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 356 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1975 Cal 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Hunter 356 and 42.9% for the 1975 Cal 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 356 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1975 Cal 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Cal 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 356 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 356 · 1975 Cal 29