1988 C&C 32 vs 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32 1988 C&C 32
VS
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 C&C 32 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
General
Manufacturer C&C Yachts Pacific Seacraft
Year 1988–1993 1980–2007
Type Sloop Cutter
Country Canada USA
Designer Cuthbertson & Cassian William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 5.79 m (19.0 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 2.54 m (8.3 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,996 kg (4,400 lbs) 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 45.8 m² (493 ft²) 23.5 m² (253 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 3
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
12.98
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
41.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
28.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.54m beam. The 1988 C&C 32 is 2.43m longer than the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24. The 1988 C&C 32 displaces approximately 82% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24, with an SA/D of 12.98 and 23.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 has a comfort ratio of 28.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 41.8% for the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 offers 3 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 C&C 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS