1988 C&C 32 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
Hanse 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 32Hanse 400
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsHanse
Year1988–19932002–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaGermany
DesignerCuthbertson & Cassianjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)12.10 m (39.7 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.60 m (34.8 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP29 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
Hanse 400
17.87
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
Hanse 400
30.92
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
Hanse 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
Hanse 400
16.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The Hanse 400 is 2.35m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 68% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 C&C 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · Hanse 400