1988 C&C 32 vs Hanse 415 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
Hanse 415

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 32Hanse 415
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsHanse
Year1988–19932011–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaGermany
DesignerCuthbertson & Cassianjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)12.40 m (40.7 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.90 m (35.8 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)2,650 kg (5,842 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)310 L (81.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
Hanse 415
17.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
Hanse 415
31.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
Hanse 415
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
Hanse 415
16.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and Hanse 415 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hanse 415 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hanse 415 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hanse 415 at 12.40m (40.7ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Hanse 415 is 2.65m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The Hanse 415 displaces approximately 87% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The Hanse 415, with an SA/D of 17.81 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 415 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 415 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 31.2% for the Hanse 415, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 415 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 310L water and 170L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 C&C 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 415 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 415 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · Hanse 415