1988 Contest 38 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

1988 Contest 381988 Contest 38
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Contest 38Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerContestHunter
Year1988–19961991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.5 m² (662 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Contest 38
16.01
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Contest 38
41.17
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Contest 38
0.70
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Contest 38
23.22
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Contest 38 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Contest 38 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1988 Contest 38 was penned by Dick Zaal. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1988 Contest 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1988 Contest 38 is 2.41m longer than the Hunter 30. The 1988 Contest 38 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Contest 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 61.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Contest 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1988 Contest 38 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Contest 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Contest 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Contest 38 · Hunter 30