1988 Contest 38 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

1988 Contest 381988 Contest 38
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Contest 382003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerContestSabre
Year1988–19962003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.5 m² (662 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Contest 38
16.01
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Contest 38
41.17
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Contest 38
0.70
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Contest 38
23.22
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Contest 38 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Contest 38 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1988 Contest 38 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1988 Contest 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 0.64m longer than the 1988 Contest 38. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Contest 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 61.5 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Contest 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1988 Contest 38 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Contest 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Contest 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Contest 38 · 2003 Sabre 402