1988 Contest 44CS vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

1988 Contest 44CS 1988 Contest 44CS
VS
1992 Moody 41 1992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 Contest 44CS 1992 Moody 41
General
Manufacturer Contest Moody
Year 1988–1996 1992–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Netherlands UK
Designer Dick Zaal Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 13.41 m (44.0 ft) 12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam 3.96 m (13.0 ft) 3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft 2.00 m (6.6 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 12,700 kg (27,999 lbs) 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 85.0 m² (915 ft²) 70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 75 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 300 L (79.3 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity 500 L (132.1 gal) 360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Contest 44CS
15.86
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Contest 44CS
40.94
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Contest 44CS
0.68
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Contest 44CS
23.62
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Contest 44CS and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Contest 44CS is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1988 Contest 44CS was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1988 Contest 44CS measures 13.41m (44.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1988 Contest 44CS is 0.91m longer than the 1992 Moody 41. The 1988 Contest 44CS displaces approximately 30% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Contest 44CS has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 85.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Contest 44CS has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Contest 44CS offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.68). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 1988 Contest 44CS and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Contest 44CS provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 500L of water capacity and 300L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Contest 44CS is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Contest 44CS has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS