2003 Hunter 41 AC vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison
2003 Hunter 41 AC
1992 Moody 41
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2003 Hunter 41 AC | 1992 Moody 41 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Moody |
| Year | 2003–2007 | 1992–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | UK |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 4.09 m (13.4 ft) | 3.86 m (12.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,072 kg (20,000 lbs) | 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 73.2 m² (788 ft²) | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Shoal draft | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 360 L (95.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 7 |
| Cabins | 3 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.