2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
VS
1992 Moody 41 1992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 1992 Moody 41
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Moody
Year 2000–2005 1992–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France UK
Designer Groupe Finot Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 12.22 m (40.1 ft) 12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL 10.52 m (34.5 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam 3.90 m (12.8 ft) 3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,200 kg (18,078 lbs) 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast 2,800 kg (6,173 lbs) 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 69.0 m² (743 ft²) 70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 130 L (34.3 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 7
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
17.24
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
34.15
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
0.77
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
16.90
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is a 2000s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 measures 12.22m (40.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 0.28m longer than the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.24 and 69.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 34.2% for the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS