2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
VS
1983 Pearson 31 1983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 1983 Pearson 31
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Pearson
Year 2000–2005 1983–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Groupe Finot William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 12.22 m (40.1 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 10.52 m (34.5 ft) 7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam 3.90 m (12.8 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,200 kg (18,078 lbs) 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast 2,800 kg (6,173 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 69.0 m² (743 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 130 L (34.3 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 6
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
17.24
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
34.15
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
0.77
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
16.90
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is a 2000s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 measures 12.22m (40.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is 2.77m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 displaces approximately 90% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.24 and 69.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 34.2% for the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS