2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
VS
2000 Sabre 386 2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 2000 Sabre 386
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Sabre
Year 2000–2005 2000–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Groupe Finot Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 12.22 m (40.1 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 10.52 m (34.5 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.90 m (12.8 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,200 kg (18,078 lbs) 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast 2,800 kg (6,173 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 69.0 m² (743 ft²) 60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 130 L (34.3 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 7
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
17.24
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
34.15
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
0.77
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
16.90
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is a 2000s design by Beneteau from France, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 measures 12.22m (40.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is 0.64m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.24 and 69.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 34.2% for the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS