Hunter 33 vs 1978 Sabre 30 — Comparison

Hunter 33Hunter 33
VS
1978 Sabre 301978 Sabre 30

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 331978 Sabre 30
General
ManufacturerHunterSabre
Year1988–19941978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHunter Design TeamRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)2.97 m (9.7 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,451 kg (3,199 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.0 m² (517 ft²)37.0 m² (398 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 33
17.23
1978 Sabre 30
15.92
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 33
38.09
1978 Sabre 30
39.98
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 33
0.80
1978 Sabre 30
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 33
18.10
1978 Sabre 30
20.59

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 33 and 1978 Sabre 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 33 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1978 Sabre 30 is a 1970s offering from Sabre from USA. The Hunter 33 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1978 Sabre 30 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the Hunter 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1978 Sabre 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 2.97m beam. The Hunter 33 is 0.92m longer than the 1978 Sabre 30. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 Sabre 30, with an SA/D of 15.92 and 37.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1978 Sabre 30 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Hunter 33 and 40.0% for the 1978 Sabre 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1978 Sabre 30 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Sabre 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 33 · 1978 Sabre 30