Hunter 33 vs 1984 C&C 37+ — Comparison

Hunter 33 Hunter 33
VS
1984 C&C 37+ 1984 C&C 37+

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hunter 33 1984 C&C 37+
General
Manufacturer Hunter C&C Yachts
Year 1988–1994 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Canada
Designer Hunter Design Team Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)
Ballast 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 48.0 m² (517 ft²) 57.0 m² (614 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 33
17.23
1984 C&C 37+
16.50
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 33
38.09
1984 C&C 37+
41.39
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 33
0.80
1984 C&C 37+
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 33
18.10
1984 C&C 37+
19.46

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 33 and 1984 C&C 37+ represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 33 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1984 C&C 37+ is a 1980s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hunter 33 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1984 C&C 37+ was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the Hunter 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1984 C&C 37+ at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1984 C&C 37+ is 1.22m longer than the Hunter 33. The 1984 C&C 37+ displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 C&C 37+, with an SA/D of 16.50 and 57.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1984 C&C 37+ has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Hunter 33 and 41.4% for the 1984 C&C 37+, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1984 C&C 37+ offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 C&C 37+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 C&C 37+ offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS