Hunter 33 vs 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 — Comparison

Hunter 33Hunter 33
VS
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 332010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
General
ManufacturerHunterHallberg-Rassy
Year1988–19942010–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerHunter Design TeamGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)12.08 m (39.6 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.0 m² (517 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 33
17.23
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 33
38.09
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 33
0.80
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 33
18.10
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 33 and 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 33 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Hunter 33 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the Hunter 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 at 12.08m (39.6ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 2.02m longer than the Hunter 33. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 93% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Hunter 33 and 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 33 · 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40