Hunter 33 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison
Hunter 33
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 33 | 2013 Elan 350 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Elan |
| Year | 1988–1994 | 2013–2018 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Slovenia |
| Designer | Hunter Design Team | Rob Humphreys |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 9.30 m (30.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 3.46 m (11.4 ft) |
| Draft | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) | 2.00 m (6.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) | 6,100 kg (13,448 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) | 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 48.0 m² (517 ft²) | 58.0 m² (624 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 170 L (44.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 33 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 33 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The Hunter 33 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.
In terms of size, the Hunter 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 0.61m longer than the Hunter 33. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 28% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Hunter 33 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 33 · 2013 Elan 350