1988 Najad 331 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1988 Najad 331
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Najad 3311983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerNajadIrwin
Year1988–19981983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,000 kg (4,409 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Najad 331
15.15
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Najad 331
40.82
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Najad 331
0.75
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Najad 331
20.43
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Najad 331 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Najad 331 is a 1980s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1988 Najad 331 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1988 Najad 331 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1988 Najad 331 is 0.31m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Najad 331 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.15 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1988 Najad 331 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Najad 331 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.8% for the 1988 Najad 331 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Najad 331 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Najad 331 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Najad 331 · 1983 Irwin 32