1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 vs 1978 Cape Dory 270 — Comparison

1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
VS
1978 Cape Dory 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Pacific Seacraft 311978 Cape Dory 270
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftCape Dory
Year1988–20071978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)6.40 m (21.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.5 m² (436 ft²)28.0 m² (301 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine25 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
1978 Cape Dory 270
14.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
1978 Cape Dory 270
41.66
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
1978 Cape Dory 270
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02
1978 Cape Dory 270
24.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 1978 Cape Dory 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1978 Cape Dory 270 is a 1970s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was penned by William Crealock. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1978 Cape Dory 270 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is 1.22m longer than the 1978 Cape Dory 270. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 83% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 1978 Cape Dory 270, with an SA/D of 14.60 and 28.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has a comfort ratio of 24.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 41.7% for the 1978 Cape Dory 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 · 1978 Cape Dory 270