1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Pacific Seacraft 312013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftBeneteau
Year1988–20072013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam CrealockVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.5 m² (436 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine25 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths52
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was penned by William Crealock. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 0.65m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3