1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Pacific Seacraft 311982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftWesterly
Year1988–20071982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerWilliam CrealockEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.5 m² (436 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine25 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was penned by William Crealock. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 0.05m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 · 1982 Westerly Konsort