1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
VS
1990 Sabre 36 1990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 1990 Sabre 36
General
Manufacturer Pacific Seacraft Sabre
Year 1988–2007 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer William Crealock Roger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 40.5 m² (436 ft²) 52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 25 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was penned by William Crealock. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 1.52m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 Sabre 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Sabre 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Sabre 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS