1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison

1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
VS
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Pacific Seacraft
Year 1994–2003 1988–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden USA
Designer Olle Enderlein William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 8.85 m (29.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 7.70 m (25.3 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam 3.02 m (9.9 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.50 m (4.9 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,700 kg (8,157 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 38.0 m² (409 ft²) 40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was penned by Olle Enderlein. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 measures 8.85m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.02m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is 0.60m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS