1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 | 2003 Sabre 402 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pacific Seacraft | Sabre |
| Year | 1988–2007 | 2003–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | William Crealock | Jim Taylor |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) | 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 40.5 m² (436 ft²) | 66.0 m² (710 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 25 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 227 L (60.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was penned by William Crealock. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.
In terms of size, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 2.74m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 64% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 · 2003 Sabre 402