1988 Swan 38 vs 1975 Cal 29 — Comparison

1988 Swan 381988 Swan 38
VS
1975 Cal 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Swan 381975 Cal 29
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanCal
Year1988–19931975–1981
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandUSA
DesignerGerman FrersBill Lapworth
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.55 m (11.6 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.2 m² (680 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Swan 38
16.78
1975 Cal 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Swan 38
42.42
1975 Cal 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Swan 38
0.73
1975 Cal 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Swan 38
21.86
1975 Cal 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Swan 38 and 1975 Cal 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Swan 38 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1975 Cal 29 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1988 Swan 38 was penned by German Frers. The 1975 Cal 29 was designed by Bill Lapworth.

In terms of size, the 1988 Swan 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1975 Cal 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1988 Swan 38 is 2.71m longer than the 1975 Cal 29. The 1988 Swan 38 displaces approximately 136% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Swan 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 63.2 m² of sail area. The 1975 Cal 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Swan 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Swan 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1975 Cal 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1988 Swan 38 and 42.9% for the 1975 Cal 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Swan 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1975 Cal 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Swan 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Swan 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Swan 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Swan 38 · 1975 Cal 29